I'm thinking we should steer clear of speculation about our browsing capabilities unless it's really necessary. Since our environment shows we have network access, we can offer to check sources upon request. I should ask the user for a specific link and clarify what they need. Now, I'll craft a concise response in Chinese to ask them what they're looking for and provide a little context while being cautious.
这是个挺猛的传闻。现在还不清楚你看到的是哪家西媒、哪篇报道。你需要我做哪件事？
- 帮你核实来源与可信度（比对 Marca/AS/Relevo/Cadena SER 等是否有独立报道）
- 快速梳理传闻要点与可能影响
- 写一段中立解读/社媒贴文
简单背景与提醒：
- “阿隆索”多指哈维·阿隆索；但维尼修斯在皇马，阿隆索目前并非皇马主帅，这类说法多半是二次转述或标题党，需要看原文语境。
- 若真有“教练与更衣室冷战”，通常会在赛前发布会措辞、出场名单与更衣室可靠记者口径上出现一致迹象；若只有单一匿名源，可信度偏低。
如果你有链接或截图发我，我可以按来源级别做快速鉴别，并给出结论与要点摘要。
